Vendor Scoring Matrix
Purpose: Objectively compare candidates for each vendor category Use: Fill in scores after each vendor meeting/call
Scoring template (per vendor)
For each candidate, score 1-10 on each criterion. Multiply by weight. Total = weighted score.
Despachante scoring
| Criterion | Weight | Candidate A | Candidate B | Candidate C |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fee (lower = better) | 25% | |||
| Experience in cosmetics | 20% | |||
| References verifiable | 15% | |||
| Communication speed | 15% | |||
| Flexibility (cancellation, terms) | 10% | |||
| Local presence (Asunción) | 10% | |||
| Chemistry / trust | 5% | |||
| TOTAL | 100% |
Contador scoring
| Criterion | Weight | Candidate A | Candidate B | Candidate C |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly fee (lower = better) | 20% | |||
| E-commerce experience | 20% | |||
| RUC amendment experience | 15% | |||
| Import knowledge (DINAVISA) | 15% | |||
| References verifiable | 10% | |||
| Communication speed | 10% | |||
| Office in Asunción | 5% | |||
| Chemistry | 5% | |||
| TOTAL | 100% |
Imprentas scoring
| Criterion | Weight | Candidate A | Candidate B | Candidate C |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price (lower = better) | 25% | |||
| Quality (samples shown) | 20% | |||
| Lead time | 20% | |||
| MOQ flexibility | 15% | |||
| Design support | 10% | |||
| Discretion experience | 5% | |||
| Local pickup | 5% | |||
| TOTAL | 100% |
Courier scoring
| Criterion | Weight | Candidate A | Candidate B | Candidate C |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price (lower = better) | 30% | |||
| Coverage (all PY) | 25% | |||
| Tracking online | 20% | |||
| Delivery time (real) | 15% | |||
| Insurance | 5% | |||
| Customer service | 5% | |||
| TOTAL | 100% |
Decision rules
When scores are close (within 10%)
Choose by: 1. Gut feel (in-person meeting is informative beyond numbers) 2. Communication quality (faster responses = better service) 3. References (verified > unverified)
When scores are very different (>20%)
Choose highest scorer. No debate.
When all candidates score poorly
Reject all + search more. Don't settle.
When cost is 30%+ higher than budget
Negotiate first. Many vendors will lower for guaranteed recurring work.
When vendor is "perfect but unavailable for next 2 weeks"
Wait if launch can wait. Don't compromise on quality.
Negotiation tactics
Tactic 1: "I have 2 other quotes"
"Gracias por la propuesta. Estoy evaluando 2 alternativas. Tu tarifa está en línea pero [competitor] ofrece [X]. ¿Pueden mejorar?"
Tactic 2: "Long-term commitment for better rate"
"Si contrato 6 meses de servicios con vos, ¿podrías ofrecer una tarifa fija con descuento de 10-15%?"
Tactic 3: "Bundle pricing"
"Si contrato [despachante + contador] con vos / tu estudio, ¿hay descuento por bundle?"
Tactic 4: "Pay upfront for discount"
"Si pago 6 meses anticipados, ¿podrías darme un 10% adicional?"
Tactic 5: "Trial period"
"¿Podríamos hacer 1 mes de prueba con tarifa reducida? Si funciona, contrato 6 meses."
After selection: engagement letter template
Key clauses to include
1. SCOPE
- Services provided (specific list)
- Out of scope (what's not included)
2. FEES
- Monthly retainer (if any)
- Per-service fees
- Out-of-pocket expenses (DINAVISA fees, courier, etc.)
- Payment terms (net-15, net-30, etc.)
3. TERM
- Start date
- End date (or month-to-month)
- Cancellation terms (30 days written notice)
4. CONFIDENTIALITY
- Sarah's customer data stays private
- Vendor won't share business info with competitors
- Vendor won't contact Sarah's customers directly
5. SERVICE LEVEL
- Response time SLA (e.g., 24h WhatsApp)
- Escalation path
- Performance reviews (quarterly)
6. OWNERSHIP
- Sarah owns customer relationships
- Sarah owns product content (descriptions, photos)
- Sarah owns brand identity (logo, colors)
7. LIABILITY
- Vendor errors: vendor pays fix cost
- Sarah errors: Sarah pays
- Mutual errors: split
Last updated: June 26, 2026